Vision of Britain | 1921 Census: County Report

1921 Census of England and Wales, County Report (Sample Report Title: Census 1921: England and Wales: Series of County Parts. County of Norfolk), Table 3 : " Population, Acreage, Private Families and Dwellings".

Show top level table	Runcorn	Show Cheshire AdmC table

Click on the unit name for its home page If appears click for more detailed statistics	Area in Statute Acres (Land and Inland Water) [1]	Total Population					Private Families and Dwellings
		1911	1921				Private Families [7]	Population in Private Families [8]	Structurally Separate Dwellings occupied [9]	Rooms occupied [10]	Rooms per Person [11]
		Persons [2]	Persons [3]	Males [4]	Females [5]	Persons per Acre [6]	Private Families [7]	Population in Private Families [8]	Structurally Separate Dwellings occupied [9]	Rooms occupied [10]	Rooms per Person [11]
Runcorn RD Total	49,117	28,216	28,934	14,188	14,746	-	6,552	-	6,291	33,783	-
Acton Grange CP/Tn	971	142	145	68	77	-	31	-	31	189	-
Alvanley CP/Ch	1,513	306	278	131	147	-	69	-	69	316	-
Antrobus CP/Tn	2,114	387	366	185	181	-	82	-	82	500	-
Appleton CP/Tn	3,186	794	800	395	405	-	187	-	186	1,129	-
Aston By Sutton CP/Ch	1,408	276	255	132	123	-	53	-	52	283	-
Aston Grange CP/Tn	458	48	37	29	8	-	5	-	3	14	-
Bartington CP/Tn	312	71	74	43	31	-	15	-	13	82	-
Clifton CP/Tn	657	204	198	115	83	-	37	-	37	177	-
Crowley CP/Tn	1,400	172	146	76	70	-	29	-	29	170	-
Daresbury CP/Ch	607	135	104	45	59	-	26	-	26	182	-
Dutton CP/Tn	2,089	484	402	213	189	-	46	-	43	221	-
Frodsham CP/AP	2,508	3,049	3,025	1,488	1,537	-	688	-	650	3,185	-
Frodsham Lordship CP/Tn	2,630	1,637	1,604	729	875	-	401	-	344	1,876	-
Lands Common To Frodsham and Frodsham Lordship ExP/PA	29	0	0	0	0	-	0	-	0	0	-
Grappenhall AP/CP	1,610	1,803	1,945	927	1,018	-	462	-	442	2,537	-
Great Budworth AP/Tn/CP	903	486	486	226	260	-	108	-	104	538	-
Halton CP/Ch	1,840	1,294	1,508	757	751	-	350	-	336	1,595	-
Hatton CP/Tn	1,049	303	327	174	153	-	75	-	73	313	-
Helsby CP/Tn	1,320	1,891	1,890	890	1,000	-	443	-	414	2,094	-
Higher Whitley CP/Tn	1,020	336	343	189	154	-	85	-	81	420	-
Keckwick CP/Tn	528	64	63	32	31	-	12	-	12	70	-
Kingsley CP/Tn	2,709	1,014	1,051	540	511	-	249	-	233	1,234	-
Kingswood CP/Tn	1,918	463	490	262	228	-	53	-	49	213	-
Latchford Without CP	184	755	797	361	436	-	216	-	216	1,384	-
Lower Whitley Tn/CP	1,136	171	162	87	75	-	40	-	40	242	-
Manley Tn/CP	1,337	327	328	159	169	-	75	-	75	413	-
Moore Tn/CP	916	440	433	205	228	-	111	-	103	558	-
Newton By Daresbury CP/Tn	785	160	122	68	54	-	29	-	29	178	-
Newton By Frodsham CP/Tn	442	311	381	194	187	-	18	-	18	109	-
Norley CP/Ch	1,411	740	790	385	405	-	188	-	186	1,081	-
Norton CP/Tn	2,236	277	238	123	115	-	55	-	52	284	-
Preston on the Hill CP/Tn	1,154	440	449	230	219	-	95	-	90	501	-
Seven Oaks CP/Tn	631	149	134	72	62	-	35	-	35	196	-
Stockham CP/Tn	331	32	27	13	14	-	4	-	4	30	-
Stockton Heath CP	189	4,370	4,684	2,203	2,481	-	1,107	-	1,100	5,810	-
Stretton CP/Ch	1,133	346	352	176	176	-	79	-	76	466	-
Sutton Tn/CP	1,197	409	397	192	205	-	90	-	88	439	-
Thelwall CP/Ch	1,256	517	462	219	243	-	110	-	108	719	-
Walton Inferior CP/Tn	540	1,068	1,193	559	634	-	284	-	269	1,560	-
Walton Superior CP/Tn	437	200	202	91	111	-	41	-	39	297	-
Weston CP/Tn	1,023	2,145	2,246	1,205	1,041	-	469	-	454	2,178	-

Click on the triangles for all about a particular number.

Using data from this table, Vision of Britain can map the following rates for within Runcorn RD:

Rate	Date
Population Density (Persons per Acre)	1921
Rate of Population Change (% over previous 10 years)	1921

This website does not try to provide an exact replica of the original printed census tables, which often had thousands of rows and far more columns than will fit on our web pages. Instead, we let you drill down from national totals to the most detailed data available. The column headings are those that appeared in the original printed report. The numbers presented here, which are the same ones we use to create statistical maps and graphs, come from the census table and have usually been carefully checked.

The system can only hold statistics for units listed in our administrative gazetteer, so some rows from the original table may be missing. Sometimes big low-level units, like urban parishes, were divided between more than one higher-level units, like Registration sub-Districts. This is why some pages will give a higher figure for a lower-level unit: it covers the whole of the lower-level unit, not just the part within the current higher-level unit.